Away in a Manger
In the
middle of the nineteenth century Rector Phillip brooks of Philadelphia took a
pilgrimage tour to the Holy Land. On his return he was moved to compose a poem.
It went:-
"O
little town of Bethlehem
How still we
see thee lie,
Beneath thy
deep and dreamless sleep
The silent
stars go by. " etc. etc.
and became a well-loved Christmas carol. It is clear that
the rector was very impressed with the peacefulness and serenity of Bethlehem.
More than
two and a half thousand years earlier a local prophet, Micah, also made
reference to this town. He wrote:-
" But
you, Bethlehem, Ephrathah,
though you
are small among the clans of Judah,
out of you
will come for me
one who will
be ruler over Israel,
whose
origins are from old, from ancient times" ( Micah,5:2).
This was written in uncertain times when Assyrian forces
were overrunning Judah and Bethlehem was a town which could easily be
conquered. It was not an important town at that time.
Later Jewish writers saw these words as a prophecy that the
Jewish Messiah would be born in this
town. So we have Matthew in his gospel describing how Joseph and Mary,
who according to him were residents there in their own home, having a child who
was named Jesus. Luke, in his gospel, had Joseph and Mary coming south from
their hometown of Nazareth in Galilee to Bethlehem where Mary gave birth to her
first child, Jesus. These two biblical writers, Matthew and Luke , firmly
established the village of Bethlehem as the place where Jesus was born. People
are still journeying to this place, today more than ever, to see for themselves
this town.
Like the shepherds of old we also made our way to Bethlehem
to meditate on Jesus' birth, remembered in its geographic setting. Unlike
Rector Brooks who remembered the "silent stars" of his evening visit
we were there in the midday warmth of a clear October day. And his "Little
town" had grown into a scattered, in parts untidy, city of many thousands
of people.
Our focus, however, was not on its size or appearance but on
the Church of the Nativity, one of the most visited pilgrim sites in the Holy
land. According to tradition, this old basilica is built over the place where
Jesus was born. To be more exact the present building was built on the
remains of a previous church built over
the cave where Jesus was born.
Hey, wait a minute! Did you say CAVE? Jesus was born in a
CAVE?
Yes, well that's what the Church of the Nativity is telling
us. The first church built here was constructed by Emperor Constantine the
Great. It was mainly his mother, Helena, who travelled widely throughout the
Holy Land locating places which had reference to the life of Jesus. According
to the information she tracked down, Jesus was born in a cave here in
Bethlehem. So in 327 Constantine had a church built over the cave to preserve
the site for posterity.
This original church was burnt down in 550 but a replacement
was built over the site fifteen years later. It is this sixth century church,
with various renovations, which one can visit today. It is one of the oldest
churches in the Holy Land.
So through the very low front door- the Door of Humility -
walk up the aisle to the main altar, then down the steps into an underground
cave. And there under an altar ( the Altar of Nativity) is a silver star. This
marks the spot. But a CAVE? What about the stable one sees in all the nativity
scenes which pop up in the months before Christmas?
A stable or a cave? Where was he born? That is the question.
Matthew seems to indicate that Jesus was born in Joseph and Mary's home, for
when the Magi arrived looking for him 18-24 months after his birth they came to
"the house where they saw the child with his mother Mary"( Matthew
2:11). Luke on the other hand says that the Nazareth visitors couldn't find a
place to lodge and so Mary had her baby where the only place to lay the child
down was a manger. Luke writes: "She wrapped him in cloths and placed him
in a manger, because there was no room for them in the inn"(Luke 2:7). And
later, the sign given to the shepherds by the angel of the Lord was that they
would "find a baby wrapped in cloths and lying in a manger"(Luke
2:12).
These two references of Luke are responsible for the
generally held impression that Jesus was born in a stable behind an inn. Here
is just one of the many confusions which surround the birth of Jesus. Luke does
not say that it was in a stable, simply that Mary lay the baby in a manger.
The written indication that the birth place was in a cave
goes back a long way. Justin Martyr, born around 100 AD writes in a book
entitled Dialogue with Trypho:"But
when the Child was born in Bethlehem, since Joseph could not find a lodging in
that village, he took up his quarters in a certain cave near the village; and
while they were there Mary brought forth the Christ and placed him in a
manger" (Chapter 78).
And so the biblical scholars argue one way and the other.
An
so what about my personal visit to this traditional site of the birth of Jesus?
Well, it left me all a little confused and, I must say, not spiritually
uplifted because of my time there. My main memory of the Church of the Nativity
is the small (low) entrance door. It is easy to see where the name Door of
Humility came from. One really has to bow low where entering the building.
Inside can be seen the old stone work which outlined the original entrance -
much larger and grander. We were told that the entrance had been purposely
lowered so that horsemen were not able to ride their steeds into the church.
True or another urban myth?
Stooping low to enter the Church of the Nativity.
And the cave in which the Altar of the Nativity covering the
fourteen pointed star was situated was very crowded with people eager to stoop
down and photograph or kiss the star and meditate on the birth of the Lord. It
was nearing the end of a long and tiring day during which many holy sites had
been visited, and unfortunately this place did not receive the attention from
me which it merited. The church next door awaited with its own caves and
stories.
And let's
face it. Most Christians are quite happy with the usual nativity scene we are
used to seeing today. This is the one in which as many of the elements
mentioned by Matthew and Luke (and some not mentioned by them) are crowded into
a stable. We must not let the true facts (if indeed they can be discerned)
stand in the way of this romantised
version.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment